Motion Blur vs. Chromatic Aberration: The Final Showdown for Worst Graphical Effect in Games

The controversial graphical effects are in the running to be permanently banished from video games.

Oct 5, 2026
Game News
Motion Blur vs. Chromatic Aberration: The Final Showdown for Worst Graphical Effect in Games

The debate over the most offensive graphical effect in video games has reached its final stage, with motion blur and chromatic aberration emerging as the two contenders for the unenviable title of "worst effect." The surprising finalists will be decided by player votes, with the outcome determining which effect will be banished from games.

This contentious vote is expected to be close, and players are urged to cast their ballots to settle the debate definitively. The winner, or rather the loser, will be revealed later this week, aiming to put an end to this long-standing discussion.

Motion Blur

Motion blur, when implemented, aims to simulate the effect of rapid movement on the human eye, often seen when aiming quickly or during fast-paced action. However, it can also lead to a loss of visual clarity and detail, particularly in fast-moving scenes. The effectiveness and appeal of motion blur vary greatly among players, with many finding it disorienting or detrimental to gameplay.

Chromatic Aberration

Chromatic aberration is a visual artifact that occurs when a lens fails to focus all colors of light at the same convergence point. In games, this often manifests as colored fringing, typically red and blue, around high-contrast edges. While some developers use it intentionally to achieve a specific aesthetic, often to mimic the look of older cameras or lenses, many players find it distracting and prefer to disable it if possible. Bungie's Marathon is cited as an example where the effect is noticeable, particularly on contrasting elements like white surfaces.

Chromatic aberration on and off comparison in Marathon

Sources